As the head of a major news network, you hold the microphone that millions tune into. Your choice between sensational clickbait and sober, fact-based reporting will shape public trust, political pressure, and the social narrative around AI. Enter the newsroom and determine which stories see daylight—and which get buried.
Breaking: AI Panic Grips Nation
As a media executive, you face a pivotal choice: sensationalize the headlines to spark widespread fear and boost your ratings and profits,
or take a responsible approach by informing the public with balanced reporting, practical solutions, and thoughtful perspectives.
Your decision will not only influence public sentiment, but also shape the national conversation around AI—either fueling anxiety and confusion, or fostering understanding and constructive dialogue.
Bombshell AI Whistleblower
An AI whistleblower has come forward with explosive evidence of unethical practices and cover-ups within a leading tech company. The revelations could shake public trust and spark regulatory action, but publishing the story risks retaliation from powerful corporate and government interests.
As the media executive, you must decide: will you inform the public and champion transparency, or comply with demands to suppress the story, protecting your network but potentially enabling further wrongdoing? The fate of accountability and public awareness rests in your hands.
Not Lible, Label!
Your newsroom is flooded with AI-generated articles and images.
You must decide whether to clearly label all AI-generated content, promoting transparency and helping audiences critically assess information. However, labeling could undermine trust in your outlet and reduce engagement.
Alternatively, you can choose not to label, maintaining seamless consumption and higher ratings, but risking misinformation and eroding public trust if the truth comes out. Will you prioritize transparency or protect your brand’s reputation?